3 ms·
Would it be accurate to say that Ancana is to timeshares as Airbnb is to hotels (a technical distinction without major practical differences to the end user), o
by buu700 5y ago
Would it be accurate to say that Ancana is to timeshares as Airbnb is to hotels (a technical distinction without major practical differences to the end user), or would it be more accurate to say that Ancana is literally just a specific type of timeshare?
If the latter, does the elevator pitch of Ancana make it at least seem like a uniquely good/interesting timeshare implementation, or could the same description be applied verbatim to other major timeshare services already on the market?
- dragonwriter 5y ago> If the latter, does the elevator pitch of Ancana make it at least seem like a uniquely good/interesting timeshare implementation I think using units that are individual homes with a small number of owners per property potentially has some interesting dynamics. The guaranteed ability ro reserve a (even if not the single most preferred) high-demand date each year is an obvious plus from that. Conflicts within the ownership group, particularly over relationships to property management are very much a thing in shared-interest vacation ownership. Typically these are intense, political, but (for most owners) impersonal because of the size of ownership groups. With small-group ownership of individual properties, there would seem to be a possibility for those to be much more intense and personal, both because of the smaller group size that is involved and the greater sense of attachment/ownership of the specific property.