4 ms·
Yep, two points to add to the monthly costs approach: 1) you still have to correct the nominal monthly fees for nominal income levels of households, roughly 50
by IkmoIkmo 5y ago
Yep, two points to add to the monthly costs approach:
1) you still have to correct the nominal monthly fees for nominal income levels of households, roughly 50k in 2008 to 70k today.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEHOINUSA646N https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEHOINUSA646N
2) the monthly fees is not a full expense figure. A 30 year mortgage that gets paid off 100%, has 3.3% of principal paydown per year on average, versus 2.8% mortgage rates.
That means a good chunk of the mortgage payments are in essence savings, rather than money you'll never see again like interest.
That's always going to be true, but the share of your monthly fees that goes towards principal paydown (i.e., equity that is building up, money that you actually own) is now much larger, as the interest payments per dollar borrowed came down.
- arcticbull 5y ago> That means a good chunk of the mortgage payments are in essence savings, rather than money you'll never see again like interest. Interest on the first $750K is tax deductible, so you will see up to half that money again :)
- brewdad 5y agoAssuming you itemize, which most taxpayers don't do anymore. 11.4% of taxpayers itemized in 2018* * https://www.irs.gov/statistics/soi-tax-stats-tax-stats-at-a-glance https://www.irs.gov/statistics/soi-tax-stats-tax-stats-at-a-...
- IkmoIkmo 5y agoTrue but that hasn't really changed compared to before.