Here’s their paper: https://www.usenix.org/system/files/sec21-kulshrestha.pdf https://www.usenix.org/system/files/sec21-kulshrestha.pdf Their system is vulnera

Here’s their paper: https://www.usenix.org/system/files/sec21-kulshrestha.pdf https://www.usenix.org/system/files/sec21-kulshrestha.pdf Their system is vulnerable in all the ways they claim. However Apple’s system is not the same and does contain mitigations. > Apple’s muted response about possible misuse is especially puzzling because it’s a high-profile flip-flop. This is a dishonest statement. Apple has not been muted about the concerns these researchers are presenting. They address them here: https://www.apple.com/child-safety/pdf/Security_Threat_Model_Review_of_Apple_Child_Safety_Features.pdf https://www.apple.com/child-safety/pdf/Security_Threat_Model... There is nothing in this piece that relates to Apple’s actual technology. These researchers obviously have the background to review what Apple has said and identify flaws, but they have not done so here.