> This article is a dog whistle for right-wing behaviour and is quite frankly problematic Every time I see a sentence like this, I interpret it as the first st

> This article is a dog whistle for right-wing behaviour and is quite frankly problematic Every time I see a sentence like this, I interpret it as the first step of an attempt to reduce speech. Step 1: Identify 'problematic' content. Step 2: Create rules to limit the distribution of 'problematic' content. Step 3: Broaden the definition of 'problematic' content to include anything that disagrees with a specific point of view. Step 4: Dystopian hell straight from Orwell. > can make sure that the things you see, and the way the algorithms work, are done in a way that is good for you. Is this a 'woosh' moment? Is this intended to be satire? > I used to be against mass surveillance, logging everything > Is this what we should look into next? If this is satire, can you please clarify?