4 ms·
SPARQL is substantially less powerful than SQL. No delete/update/insert statements, no subselects, and limited aggregation and functions. I've used SPARQL a lot
by arockwell 15y ago
SPARQL is substantially less powerful than SQL. No delete/update/insert statements, no subselects, and limited aggregation and functions. I've used SPARQL a lot in the past year and I am constantly running into limitations.
Performance has also been very poor (we use Jena SDB). I don't know if poor performance is an implementation problem or an overall weakness.
- yawniek 15y agowell there are efforts for updates etc. but yes, you have limitations with sparql, thats why i think it is not the final solution. but it is a first approach to push the possibility to query data to a different layer.