4 ms·

If there really are minors on there, I'm glad they're being forced to clean up their act. Downvote me all you want for feeling that way.

detcader 5y ago
How old does a person have to be to start deserving blame for their choices of sexual activity? Can you come off anonymous and let me know?
- afrodc_ 5y ago
  18 for consensual actions, barring abuse and trafficking
- bsder 5y ago
  Countries have specific laws about age of consent. Being on the internet doesn't magically invalidate those laws.
  - detcader 5y ago
    My issue isn't that OnlyFans is trying to prevent content by minors, it's that kilroy thinks the minors are somehow to blame for "their [unclean] acts"
    - kilroy123 5y ago
      Excuse me? Where did I said that? People are profiting off the sexual exploitation of minors. You're just seeing what you want to see.
      - detcader 5y ago
        Please excuse me as I misread your first post. By "they're" you meant OF, not the minors. I apologize, sloppy reading on my part.
johnnyanmac 5y ago
on a site revceiving tens of thousands of media a day over years, it's very to point to a dozen pieces and say that the entire site is full of it. Humans don't reason with large numbers very well and I have a hunch that OF was just another recent victim of this psychological phenomenon. Especially when I read attempts to cast them that way with >In May, BBC News revealed the site was failing to prevent under-18s from selling and appearing in explicit videos, despite it being illegal for children to do so. At the time, OnlyFans said attempts to use the site fraudulently were "rare". but end up also mentoning: > Under-18s have used fake identification to set up accounts, and police say a 14-year-old used her grandmother's passport. aside form these mentions, most of the article focuses on prostitution. Which is a much more gray moral quandry than underage participants.

detcader 5y ago

How old does a person have to be to start deserving blame for their choices of sexual activity? Can you come off anonymous and let me know?

afrodc_ 5y ago
18 for consensual actions, barring abuse and trafficking
bsder 5y ago
Countries have specific laws about age of consent. Being on the internet doesn't magically invalidate those laws.
- detcader 5y ago
  My issue isn't that OnlyFans is trying to prevent content by minors, it's that kilroy thinks the minors are somehow to blame for "their [unclean] acts"
  - kilroy123 5y ago
    Excuse me? Where did I said that? People are profiting off the sexual exploitation of minors. You're just seeing what you want to see.
    - detcader 5y ago
      Please excuse me as I misread your first post. By "they're" you meant OF, not the minors. I apologize, sloppy reading on my part.

johnnyanmac 5y ago

on a site revceiving tens of thousands of media a day over years, it's very to point to a dozen pieces and say that the entire site is full of it. Humans don't reason with large numbers very well and I have a hunch that OF was just another recent victim of this psychological phenomenon. Especially when I read attempts to cast them that way with >In May, BBC News revealed the site was failing to prevent under-18s from selling and appearing in explicit videos, despite it being illegal for children to do so. At the time, OnlyFans said attempts to use the site fraudulently were "rare". but end up also mentoning: > Under-18s have used fake identification to set up accounts, and police say a 14-year-old used her grandmother's passport. aside form these mentions, most of the article focuses on prostitution. Which is a much more gray moral quandry than underage participants.