> Do people just assume she's telling a truthful story? I have no reason to doubt that she's telling the trust from her perspective, but that being said, there

> Do people just assume she's telling a truthful story? I have no reason to doubt that she's telling the trust from her perspective, but that being said, there are always two sides to a story. > In saying that, maybe she did have some entirely crazy people around her To be honest, reading her published tweets/documents, she mostly appears to be someone who complains to HR about everything. Judging by the way her managers "dismiss" her complaints with (attempted) humor (refill whiskey bottles with fruit color and water, suggest which NERF gun she should buy, etc), i'm guessing she's been at it for a while. The sign that her managers purposely leave her out of important meetings could also be a signal that "she's more trouble than beneficial". Not saying she was wrong (or correct) when she complained, but it would certainly explain some of the hostility being shown by her team members. Reading the parts she complains about it actually sounds like a really nice and accepting/inclusive workplace, and a place i would love to work. Planning a NERF war, and your managers only concern is if you're too loud to disturb other teams :) In any case, she has published multiple (redacted) confidential documents, so i wouldn't get my hope up for a big settlement.