> Pretty much everyone deals with it and moves on with thier lives like they have throughout history. On what basis do you draw this conclusion from? > Do the

> Pretty much everyone deals with it and moves on with thier lives like they have throughout history. On what basis do you draw this conclusion from? > Do they need animals to serve as their crutch to go everywhere? Don't think so Are you their doctor? > You obviously didn't read the article I did. Service animals + allergies are definitely a problem. Saying service animals aren't useful is your unjustified opinion. > just want to peddle more weakness justification or virtue signal or have financial incentives I have PTSD. I have friends who have benefited from service animals. I have considered one. Weakness justification is a frankly offensive phrase for those who are seeking treatment for their ailment. Why isn't the person who has allergies also fostering weakness?