> It's not as simple as the title seems to suggest and I like this section for summing up a nutshell "good news, bad news" take on this: The paper isn’t sugges

> It's not as simple as the title seems to suggest and I like this section for summing up a nutshell "good news, bad news" take on this: The paper isn’t suggesting this is good news at all. The observed modifications to nutrient absorption were largely negative. The intestines don’t actually have a problem absorbing nutrients. The problem is that excess fructose can disrupt how quickly those nutrients are absorbed, which causes problems. In this case, the increased nutrient absorption isn’t a good thing.