2 ms·
Getting access to a regular web app would be sufficient to perform that kind of abuse. It just would be more difficult to automate. It seems to me that the dif
by pbasista 5y ago
Getting access to a regular web app would be sufficient to perform that kind of abuse. It just would be more difficult to automate.
It seems to me that the difficulty of getting the victim to grant access to the attacker remains the same for both the web app access and the API access.
The advantage for the attacker of getting the API access is that they can more easily automate the performing of subtle frauds over a longer period of time, thereby avoiding the detection. But a determined attacker can automate that via the web app as well.
That is why it seems to me that the difference in fraud capabilities over both channels is, in principle, negligible.
- Nursie 5y agoYes, making attacks more difficult is often the point of security. Further, with an accredited intermediary, they have more responsibility to ensure their stuff isn’t compromised, and to stick to good practice. With free for all API access the world is wide open to fraud.