3 ms·
I would have thought or hoped that companies were doing this themselves in order to test their defenses. If a disgruntled employee is capable of doing this, the
by intrasight 5y ago
I would have thought or hoped that companies were doing this themselves in order to test their defenses. If a disgruntled employee is capable of doing this, then clearly your defenses are inadequate.
- munk-a 5y agoA disgruntled employee somewhere is always going to have the capability to cause serious harm. You can isolate the harm into a single set of hands (initially the owners in all likelihood) but as your company grows you need to delegate. Most companies will initially open up their guts to every employee and then slowly restrict access - but someone somewhere always needs to retain access.