4 ms·
The implication is that these are conflicts over water, but they're not. They're "conflicts" in that something happened that somehow involved water in the perip
by pionar 5y ago
The implication is that these are conflicts over water, but they're not. They're "conflicts" in that something happened that somehow involved water in the periphery. Very misleading list.
- quietthrow 5y agoI disagree unless your comment is directed to the data provided by the OP. In that case I agree (only to a small degree) as factualness dilutes as one goes back in time also these are broad statements. As to my list that I posted above simply aggregates the data provided in the OP.