3 ms·
> The research is young. GP didn't say research on weed wasn't needed, the point is obvious double standards and that agtech should be - but isn't - this thoro
by villasv 5y ago
> The research is young.
GP didn't say research on weed wasn't needed, the point is obvious double standards and that agtech should be - but isn't - this thorough (or more, actually, but that's beside the point). So what is notable here is that this call for research doesn't come from being reasonable, it comes from partiality with plausible deniability.
- jolux 5y agoThey said there was probably already research on weed’s safety. I would argue that research is promising re: safety but more is definitely needed. I agree that this isn’t reason to delay legalization, but it’s still something that should happen.