4 ms·
This article title is clickbait, it can be interpreted as her being removed after being awarded the Nobel Prize. > It found that women make up only 19 per cent
by bArray 5y ago
This article title is clickbait, it can be interpreted as her being removed after being awarded the Nobel Prize.
> It found that women make up only 19 per cent of all profiles, but account for a quarter of page-deletion recommendations.
So, 19% of profiles, "25%" (no percentage given) of deletions - it's not insanely far off being the ratios I would expect. There are going to be some bias in there due to historic roles of men and women in society (a large number of historic politicians will be men for example).
> A well-known example is what happened to Canadian scientist Donna Strickland, who couldn't be found on Wikipedia immediately after she won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2018 (although she does have a Wikipedia page now.)
Tonnes of University Professors also don't have Wikipedia pages, despite being well published and contributing tonnes to their fields. At best they can hope to be a reference on a Wikipedia page. Some even prefer it like this.
> Another issue is that most of Wikipedia's editors are men.
Is there actually any evidence at all that gender is a notable factor? It just seems like speculation. From the original numbers, it seems like deletions are roughly equal to representation.
What this article really _fails_ at though is to actually review the Wikipedia edits [1]. In 2014 it was requested for deletion due to 'G12. Unambiguous copyright infringement' [2].
Ultimately though, if you don't like what Wikipedia are doing, stop giving them money and start your own - there is nothing stopping anybody. For example, RationalWiki was created after their articles were attacked on Conservapedia [3].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Donna_Strickland&dir=prev&limit=500&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Donna_Strickland&...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:G12&redirect=no https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:G12&red...
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalwiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalwiki
- 908B64B197 5y ago> Is there actually any evidence at all that gender is a notable factor? It just seems like speculation. From the original numbers, it seems like deletions are roughly equal to representation. I've also seen studies (I can't find them but I recall them) where they looked at Open Source contributors and the authors defaulted to male if there was no gender information available.
- ronald_raygun 5y agoIt depends on how many profiles there are. If there are 100 profiles, and a specific 19% made up 25% of deletions, then that could be just chance. If there are 1M profiles, on the other hand, then it's definitely biased.