4 ms·
This type of news story makes IT directors or C-suite members that are on the fence about 100% employee surveillance much more likely to decide "better safe tha
by clipradiowallet 5y ago
This type of news story makes IT directors or C-suite members that are on the fence about 100% employee surveillance much more likely to decide "better safe than sorry".
- javajosh 5y agoProbably. But not because it makes sense. After all, it would be easy to do bad things even with 100% surveillance. At some point, you have to trust somebody. That's especially true at big companies where the executives don't do anything except email and spreadsheets. There is no combination of email, spreadsheets, and enterprise surveillance webportal that can prevent a malefactor from doing harm, and in fact I would argue that such measures only increase the problems. Why? False positives should scare everyone, especially the good guys.
- perl4ever 5y ago>There is no combination of email, spreadsheets, and enterprise surveillance webportal that can prevent a malefactor from doing harm What do you think is used for audits and oversight if not email and spreadsheets? Or are you just saying that everything everyone does, doesn't really work?