4 ms·
Yes and no. I'd argue having an unpolished article in need of work is better than a stub as it encourages interaction. Not to mention being told to stop using
by rob_c 5y ago
Yes and no.
I'd argue having an unpolished article in need of work is better than a stub as it encourages interaction.
Not to mention being told to stop using a paywall for citing a journal (which is now out of print) as a source.
- renewiltord 5y agoThe danger of the unpolished article thing is that if there is a falsehood on it people will publish the equivalent of this article but with the title: How a Wikipedia Lie Ruined This Man’s Life. Or some such thing.
- rob_c 5y agoSo nothing should go on the internet unless it's fact checked?
- renewiltord 5y agoIt can go on the Internet. It’s just that this subsector of the Internet has rules. I don’t think anyone will complain if you blog about your thing.