3 ms·
That would be the most ridiculous attempt at propaganda ever, by any nation - to change the green on one, single image that almost nobody would ever see. "Henr
by jollybean 5y ago
That would be the most ridiculous attempt at propaganda ever, by any nation - to change the green on one, single image that almost nobody would ever see.
"Henry, change that tree to grey, it'll change hearts and minds!"
More likely is that it was either a mistake, a joke, an individual actor doing something they shouldn't.
If it were an effort of 'systematic propaganda' then it would be consistent, you'd be able to find a number of such images.
- rasz 5y ago50 years of systematically covering up for pedophiles would be 'most ridiculous' "ever', yet it also happened https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Savile_sexual_abuse_scandal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Savile_sexual_abuse_scan... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuart_Hall_(presenter)#Child_sexual_abuse_prosecution_and_conviction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuart_Hall_(presenter)#Child_... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolf_Harris#Operation_Yewtree https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolf_Harris#Operation_Yewtree https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Lee_Travis#Conviction_for_indecent_assault_and_allegations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Lee_Travis#Conviction_for... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Clifford#Indecent_assault_convictions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Clifford#Indecent_assault_... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Glitter#Sex_offences https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Glitter#Sex_offences Someone individually deciding to do it is one thing, institution with extensive ethical oversight letting it happen is another.
- jollybean 5y agoNo, it's more ridiculous to change the colour of a single image, and to posit that it's 'propaganda' in some way. Covering up for pedophiles, if that's the case, is actual propaganda, which probably takes some skill. Changing the colour of one image is obviously not propaganda, is the point.