3 ms·
> I link to one study, you say "Cherry Picking!" No. We are talking about the article. > that data is scarce Nutrition science has been around for decades an
by goodpoint 5y ago
> I link to one study, you say "Cherry Picking!"
No. We are talking about the article.
> that data is scarce
Nutrition science has been around for decades and people get PhDs in it. Like in most fields medicine there's always space to discover more but claiming that data is "scarce" is exaggerated.
> lacking solid information at a population level it's irresponsible to promote diets that may cause harm.
> To not advise people to do things that may deprive them of necessary nutrients, is the responsible thing to do.
There are millions of people in the world facing risks related to obesity like hearth attack and following other bad diets due to ignorance, or poor availability of healthy foods, or following absurd fad diets.
Of all irresponsible diet advice that can be given... you are clearly painting a boogeyman, like the article does.
That's very cheeky.
- cheese_goddess 5y ago> No. We are talking about the article. The article is citing a couple dozen studies. Which one is cherry picking? And how about the studies that show the results you prefer? I was expecting you to link to some "cherry picked" studies of you own. But I guess you can't even be arsed to do that, right? You're happy to just accuse me of "cherry picking".