> Every single department was more likely to admit a woman than a man Not quite; you can see several exceptions to this in the table in the article. The key p

> Every single department was more likely to admit a woman than a man Not quite; you can see several exceptions to this in the table in the article. The key points of the partitioned data were: No department was significantly biased against women. Most departments had a statistically significant bias towards women. It's interesting to note that the departments that ARE biased towards men have more female applicants; I wonder if being in a minority group for that department is an even more important confounding factor.