3 ms·
> You’ve made like 15 comments on this thread with this idea. Yet other people beside Cart in my thread still fail to properly understand the idea and instead
by CyberRabbi 5y ago
> You’ve made like 15 comments on this thread with this idea.
Yet other people beside Cart in my thread still fail to properly understand the idea and instead think I am suggesting not using wgpu at all.
> you can say “I told you so” then
My aim isn’t to say “I told you so” it’s to make sure people accurately understand the point I am making. Cart seems to understand the point I am making therefore I have made no further comments to him.
- wtetzner 5y agoI understand your point, but I don’t think there’s any value in including an extra layer of abstraction before you need it. Sometimes it’s clear that you need it from the start. But sometimes it’s not. And if you end up needing to support something sufficiently different from what can fit into wgpu’s API, the right point of indirection might just be the rendering system. E.g., you might just write a separate renderer for the new platform, so you can write to its model in the most efficient way.