3 ms·
I narrowly "missed" visicalc, as by the time I had a IBM compatible PC the "real thing" was already Lotus 1-2-3. But some years later, in win 3.x times, I had
by jaclaz 5y ago
I narrowly "missed" visicalc, as by the time I had a IBM compatible PC the "real thing" was already Lotus 1-2-3.
But some years later, in win 3.x times, I had to use it as there were some valuable spreadsheet that needed to be "translated" to Excel, those were fun times, the actual executable being so small and still capable of doing "amazing" things.
BTW, and as a side note, in Windows times and before Excel 95 came out (probably also after it was released), the "best" spreadsheet around was (IMHO) the very little known Borland Quattro:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quattro_Pro https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quattro_Pro
that - besides the name - was the more natural successor to Lotus 1-2-3.
- webwanderings 5y agoQuattro pro was indeed very shiny and fast compared to anything else back then.
- Torwald 5y ago> that - besides the name - was the more natural successor to Lotus 1-2-3 Quattro means four, so the name is perfect.
- jaclaz 5y agoSure, I meant that it was the natural successor not only because of the name (that was clearly chosen for that).