3 ms·
> If someone can demonstrate that a legal NSFW image (eg. regular old-fashioned pornography), can be collided with a legal, completely 100% SFW image then I'll
by hartator 5y ago
> If someone can demonstrate that a legal NSFW image (eg. regular old-fashioned pornography), can be collided with a legal, completely 100% SFW image then I'll be concerned.
Look at this other collision: https://twitter.com/SarahJamieLewis/status/1428206088118149123 https://twitter.com/SarahJamieLewis/status/14282060881181491... An attacker can send you an innocent looking picture that embbed some CSA material and you get swatted the next day.
- legostormtroopr 5y agoI think you are getting downvoted because thats the same image I replied to. Looking at those two images its plain to see why they are identical. And if someone is sending you CSA material, isn't that the point of this process. Apple identifies it as CSA, can give you a warning its sensitive, and identify they authorities that people are sending CSA. Again - this seems like a win. If Apple can automatically identify CSA material, en-masse thats good. edit: It looks like they are different URLs, but Twitter only allows people to see replies if they are logged in, so I can't see that example. edit 2: On further thought, if someone can use CSA material and produce an innocuous image with a similar hash, if they send that image to you, its still proof that the sender had CSA material. Again, its still good.