3 ms·
I think banning it is bad. If it turns out to be correct you lose so much trust in institutions (which is thin already as “experts” continue to be exposed as fr
by pcmoney 5y ago
I think banning it is bad. If it turns out to be correct you lose so much trust in institutions (which is thin already as “experts” continue to be exposed as frauds, just look at Afghanistan)
However, if it is false (most likely) then banning it puts in a dark place away from sunlight where it can grow and mutate and spread. Streisand effect comes into effect here.
- fortuna86 5y ago> (which is thin already as “experts” continue to be exposed as frauds, just look at Afghanistan) Respectfully it sounds like you already bought into the idea that "the experts" (if that can be referred to as a monolith, which I disagree it can) are usually wrong. Btw, no one got Afghanistan "wrong". Most knew the country would fall, no one knew how fast. That's a good example of how, when people claim "the experts got it wrong", they don't understand what said "experts" were actually predicting.