4 ms·
I imagine at least some of the bad reviews are there because DO serve the absolute bottom end of the market and with that comes a specific kind of difficult cus
by amiga-workbench 5y ago
I imagine at least some of the bad reviews are there because DO serve the absolute bottom end of the market and with that comes a specific kind of difficult customer.
- LAC-Tech 5y agoWhat's the high end of the VPS market?
- netr0ute 5y agoLocal datacenters
- fullstop 5y agoAWS
- amiga-workbench 5y agoThey offer a lot more than just VPS services. But compared to the likes of AWS, Azure and GCP their pricing structure is simple and predictable. That coupled with the straightforward management interface, team management & access control systems make it a very inexpensive and approachable solution. It just has a really low barrier of entry, and its partially why I chose them for some projects with my current employer. There isn't enough rope in the management UI to hang yourself with, and I can handover the lot to my replacement even if they're not particularly clued up on system administration. So to answer your question, I see DO as offering a subset of what AWS/Azure/GCP do, with the cost and complexity savings to reflect that. So those larger cloud providers are what I consider the higher end.
- woleium 5y agoand poorer performance. Their S3 compatible solution is good for archiving only
- justin-tm 5y agoCorrect. This feels like the type of people that go out of their way to give negative reviews to Taco Bell.
- ac29 5y agoThe bottom of the market is the no-name companies that offer VPS for $1/month or so, or even less in some cases. Can't comment on the quality of these offerings but I have to assume most if not nearly all of them are pretty bad (and forget about support).