3 ms·
They also want a smaller scope for the government. So it's not like saying 'I want to run this business but bring in less money', it's more like saying 'I want
by JacobAldridge 15y ago
They also want a smaller scope for the government. So it's not like saying 'I want to run this business but bring in less money', it's more like saying 'I want to run a smaller business, so what departments can we do without'. Smaller business may actually make more profit (read: be more efficient) than the larger one.
I try not to claim a political preference left or right[1], but to prevent confusion I do feel they're trying to make this 'business' much smaller than it needs to be.
[1] My political preference is merely that politicans are like diapers. They need to be changed regularly, and for the same reason.
- entangld 15y agoDoes part of corporate "efficiency" include billions of dollars in bonuses? That doesn't seem very efficient to me. The effect of large bonuses on the cost of administration seems a bit high.