3 ms·
No. The brazen part of this is Apple trying to sell the public on this being okay, effective to the point of mitigating the abuse potential. False negative AND
by salawat 5y ago
No. The brazen part of this is Apple trying to sell the public on this being okay, effective to the point of mitigating the abuse potential. False negative AND false positive have to counterweight the existence of the vector for abuse. That's what you're measuring against. You can't even guarantee that. This isn't even close to a safe or effective move. The risk management on this is hosed.