3 ms·
> If not, the only thing you'd enjoy are media targeted at pre-schoolers and young children. Oh come on, you know I wasn't talking about that kind of challenge
by yupper32 5y ago
> If not, the only thing you'd enjoy are media targeted at pre-schoolers and young children.
Oh come on, you know I wasn't talking about that kind of challenge.
There are two things:
1. Pieces that are more challenging to read/watch because the story is deeper and the challenging read is required to tell that story.
2. A piece that purposely makes it the story harder to follow, or is otherwise really difficult to follow, without adding much depth.
I was clearly talking about #2.
"In fact, the plot isn't impossible to follow – it's just extraordinarily difficult without a pen, a notepad and a pause button to hand." - The article
That's just stupid, and absolutely falls into #2. It's a crime drama.
- ubermonkey 5y ago...and we all know that a genre film cannot also be challenging!
- Firadeoclus 5y agoThe article makes the argument that the plot being hard to follow is in fact to the film's benefit. So unless you require "depth" to be plot depth, that doesn't match #2. There are qualities other than "plot depth" that can be enhanced by ambiguity. Most people don't watch a film solely for the plot. > It's a crime drama. Is that prescriptive or descriptive?