2 ms·
> This is more about trying to implant scanning capabilities on client devices. Did we think they didn't already have that ability?
by rootusrootus 5y ago
> This is more about trying to implant scanning capabilities on client devices.
Did we think they didn't already have that ability?
- salawat 5y agoNo. The brazen part of this is Apple trying to sell the public on this being okay, effective to the point of mitigating the abuse potential. False negative AND false positive have to counterweight the existence of the vector for abuse. That's what you're measuring against. You can't even guarantee that. This isn't even close to a safe or effective move. The risk management on this is hosed.