Figma is a lot harder to replace than postman and it's primary users are not developers (although they often consume the result of the primary users). I think d

Figma is a lot harder to replace than postman and it's primary users are not developers (although they often consume the result of the primary users). I think developers are more fickle than designers as a customer, especially for tools that are not central to the end result. If I deploy my app and it works it does not really matter if I tested/documented it with postman, it's not central to the app at runtime. I also think that postman's core product is a lot easier to replicate (they were not even the first to do it) than figma and there are a number of open source projects that do. When it comes to their API gallery I would expect that any serious API would come with a non-proprietary definition or documentation (in something like OpenAPI or at least just good docs) too. I don't know, I just have a hard time to see why this product (and by extension the company) is worth 5.6B.