3 ms·
Art shouldn't be unlimited. Its ok to call things screensavers, because screensavers are also cool, its just that it isnt art in the sense of "art" the word, if
by huntercross 5y ago
Art shouldn't be unlimited. Its ok to call things screensavers, because screensavers are also cool, its just that it isnt art in the sense of "art" the word, if an AI is doing it, its something else, and making it unlimited is not interesting, it is irresponsible. Its the constraints that make art what it is, not simply the definition of an infinite possibility space
- fobdkbfjh 5y agoIf you're going to gatekeep what art can be, you better have some pretty impressive creative credentials of your own. Some people say "an unlimited edition is meaningless, has no value" and all they really mean is "I'm conservative, I don't see the point of change, and I can't think of any way an unlimited edition could be interesting"
- LegitShady 5y agoHaving a different opinion isn't gatekeeping, it's disagreeing. No one is stopping this person from doing what they want. Second, if your definition of art is unlimited, it's hardly useful, so I don't think it matters.
- mrits 5y agoIt certainly isn't unlimited. It is confined by resolution and color depth.
- swayvil 5y agoWe could call art, "made-objects that get you high with beauty" We could also call art, "byproducts of artistic (beauty-guided) action"