> We can argue about the technicalities of how abusable or resilient the current implementation is. But we can agree that it's a step towards losing privacy, ye

> We can argue about the technicalities of how abusable or resilient the current implementation is. But we can agree that it's a step towards losing privacy, yes? We didn't have scanning of iDevices before, now we do. Yes, that was the intention of my original comment. The “slippery slope” is one of principle and precedent, more than this specific technical implementation.