3 ms·
The installation is impressive but the output is underwhelming. Then again, I feel the same about the pieces in most contemporary art museums.
by spoonjim 5y ago
The installation is impressive but the output is underwhelming. Then again, I feel the same about the pieces in most contemporary art museums.
- ghostbrainalpha 5y agoHe just needs a higher resolution screen, a screen that is much bigger, and placed inside of very nice frame. With the cables hidden. Then it's ready for the gallery. Especially if you could come up with a way to filter out some of the images that look too much like how a random broken monitor will output. This image in particular feels like "real" art to me. https://imgur.com/gaJVSs3 https://imgur.com/gaJVSs3
- artiszt 5y agoit's okay as it is -- IF, and only IF, the artist says so ! Rauschenberg too, as well as Lichtenstein and many others, wouldn't have liked it a bit being turned into some hotair egomaniac 0-creative wraped in plastic in some fin-groupies Schnabel'oesque or Koons'ian gallery spot
- pessimizer 5y agoIf they're dead we shouldn't worry about what they would think about what we do; we have enough to worry about.
- guipsp 5y agoTaking existing art and twisting it is art too. In fact there was a movement I can't recall the name of dedicated to this?
- scollet 5y agoThe art is the installation.
- turtlebits 5y agoAgreed, but I think the animated GIF and small, extremely compressed JPGs in the repo don't help. Maybe a youtube video?