4 ms·

So in your mind, because so far we've seen no evidence that this has been abused, it's nothing to worry about going forward? And that making an existing situati

So in your mind, because so far we've seen no evidence that this has been abused, it's nothing to worry about going forward? And that making an existing situation even more widespread is also completely OK?

colejohnson66 5y ago
It’s that the situation can’t be a “slippery slope” if there’s no evidence of there being one prior
sweetheart 5y ago
> So in your mind, because so far we've seen no evidence that this has been abused, it's nothing to worry about going forward? Yeah, basically. It doesn't seem like people actually use CSAM to screw over innocent folks, so I don't think we need to worry about it. What Apple is doing doesn't really make that any easier, so it's either already a problem, or not a problem. > And that making an existing situation even more widespread is also completely OK? I don't know if I'd say any of this is "completely OK", as I don't think I've fully formed my opinion on this whole Apple CSAM debate, but I at least agree with OP that I don't think we need to suddenly worry about people weaponizing CSAM all of a sudden when it's been an option for years now with no real stories of anyone actually being victimized.
- ribosometronome 5y ago
  And if it is a problem, not doing this doesn't resolve the problem. If it were to become a problem in the future, it could become a problem regardless of whether or not the scanning is done at the time of upload on device or at the time of upload on server.