5 ms·
I can recommend a great article answering that, however unfortunately it's in German [1]. But the gist is that there are two major unsolved challenges. One is
by hannob 5y ago
I can recommend a great article answering that, however unfortunately it's in German [1].
But the gist is that there are two major unsolved challenges.
One is finding a material stable enough to let the reactor run for longer times (all experiments like ITER only plan to run the reaction for very short times, which is okay for research, but not useful for real energy).
The other is finding a way to produce enough tritium for the reaction. It is expected that ITER alone will consume all the tritium that is available and that is currently only produced in some special kind of nuclear reactor. The idea is that eventually fusion reactors will create this tritium themselve, but noone has figured out how to practically do that.
[1] https://taz.de/Energie-durch-Kernfusion/!5707537/ https://taz.de/Energie-durch-Kernfusion/!5707537/
- willis936 5y agoTokamaks are inherently pulsed machines. No material will change this. Stellarators are very similar to tokamaks but do not use a central solenoid/transformer to induce the poloidal twist: they use the geometry of flux surface/coils/vessel. Stellarators are steady state. Tritium breeding blankets have been the answer to question 2 for longer than I've been alive. The real engineering challenges lie in divertor physics and strike point materials.
- tomsto 5y agoThis sounds interesting. You sound like you work in nuclear physics. Please can you explain, or link to an explanation of, divertor (sic?) and strike point materials?