5 ms·
Some people here in comments believe that whoever gonna check reported material on Apple side will never ever flag false-positive. We already know that NCMEC da
by SXX 5y ago
Some people here in comments believe that whoever gonna check reported material on Apple side will never ever flag false-positive. We already know that NCMEC database itself don't exclusively contain child porn, but also some other photos that closely related ot CSAM. Even if those photos don't have actual CSAM on them. But let's ignore this fact.
Do people who believe in behevolent Apple understand that CSAM don't all have some big red "CHILD PORN" sign on it? No demonic feel included. Like any porn we can suppose that many of such images might not even have any faces or literally anything that make them different from images of 18yo person.
When you think well about it brute-forcing actual porn or some jailbait images doesn't sound that impossible. All you need is a lot of totally legal porn and some compute power. Both we have in abundance.
- dannyw 5y agoI guarantee you out of millions of alleged CSAM images hapzardly added by local police and intetnet reports, thousands are legal porn of consenting adults.
- SXX 5y agoI totally sure it's very much possible, but even if this database only exclusively contained CSAM it's still very much possible for human to match false-positive since Apple can only show their snoops your photos and likely they will be compressed to some 360x360 or whatever.
- int_19h 5y agoQuite frankly, I don't even care whether the reviewers are 100% perfect or not. I did not consent to having some random stranger out there reviewing my private photos. Even if it doesn't actually have any legal consequences, it's still unacceptable.