3 ms·

I'm in the UK, and I don't think it's obvious what part of a mobile number is the "area code". With a phone number of 11 digits, how many digits form the area c

I'm in the UK, and I don't think it's obvious what part of a mobile number is the "area code". With a phone number of 11 digits, how many digits form the area code? In a world where numbers aren't even connected to specific provider, the concept of area codes for mobile phones is broken. (Technically, my area code should start with +44 as well, as that's my area from an international point of view). With landlines, you know which part of your number is the area code, because it has significance. If you call people living near you, you don't dial that code. This behaviour doesn't translate to mobiles.

corin_ 15y ago
On account of the vast majority (not all, but most) landline area codes being five digits, that is the convention for splitting mobile codes too, so 11 becomes 5,6. Maybe not everyone knows it, but pretty much everyone I know does, from people who spent most of their life pre-mobiles (e.g. my grandmother), to frinds, to young children. Even if you didn't conciously think this was the case, would you agree with me on which of the following looks the most natural? 07920 748555 0792 0748555 079 20748555 079207 48555
- pornel 15y ago
  London area code is 020, so I'd bet on "079 20748555". If a website validates those two-box input fields, then surely it knows length of the prefix better than I do.
  - corin_ 15y ago
    London is one of the few exceptions, not the rule. And even with the three digits, most Londonders I know split their phone number differently (for example "0208 XXX XXXX").
- ZeroMinx 15y ago
  I'd argue that the natural option would be 07920748555 When writing it you might choose to add spaces, but that'd be for readability, not because of some notion of area codes. It's clear even from the name that area codes doesn't apply to _mobile_ phone numbers.
  - corin_ 15y ago
    Oh sure, it's for readability that you split it (or the equivilent when speaking) - but because the standard for splitting up a mobile number is the same as the standard for splitting up a landline, it's pretty well known that, if a form (or whatever) were to want your number split in two, then you classify the first five digits of the mobile number as the "area code".

corin_ 15y ago

On account of the vast majority (not all, but most) landline area codes being five digits, that is the convention for splitting mobile codes too, so 11 becomes 5,6. Maybe not everyone knows it, but pretty much everyone I know does, from people who spent most of their life pre-mobiles (e.g. my grandmother), to frinds, to young children. Even if you didn't conciously think this was the case, would you agree with me on which of the following looks the most natural? 07920 748555 0792 0748555 079 20748555 079207 48555

pornel 15y ago
London area code is 020, so I'd bet on "079 20748555". If a website validates those two-box input fields, then surely it knows length of the prefix better than I do.
- corin_ 15y ago
  London is one of the few exceptions, not the rule. And even with the three digits, most Londonders I know split their phone number differently (for example "0208 XXX XXXX").
ZeroMinx 15y ago
I'd argue that the natural option would be 07920748555 When writing it you might choose to add spaces, but that'd be for readability, not because of some notion of area codes. It's clear even from the name that area codes doesn't apply to _mobile_ phone numbers.
- corin_ 15y ago
  Oh sure, it's for readability that you split it (or the equivilent when speaking) - but because the standard for splitting up a mobile number is the same as the standard for splitting up a landline, it's pretty well known that, if a form (or whatever) were to want your number split in two, then you classify the first five digits of the mobile number as the "area code".