4 ms·
I'm not sure what you mean. If we are talking about Apple's new feature, they will not even be alerted until you have enough matches. And the police probably w
by Grustaf 5y ago
I'm not sure what you mean. If we are talking about Apple's new feature, they will not even be alerted until you have enough matches.
And the police probably won't be using any neural hashes if they have access to your device, so I'm not sure what you are talking about.
- sandworm101 5y agoThat is an Apple current policy, not any sort of law. If the FBI wants to know if there are any collisions on a particular phone, that will be shared. If the FBI wants to know of all single collisions, that too must be shared. A corporation's internal policy decisions are nothing when faced with a government official carrying a warrant. If they have data indicating possible crimes, no matter how small, they can be forced to divulge it to investigators. Unlike Lavabit, I don't think Apple will ever close up shop to protect customer data.
- Grustaf 5y agoWell of course if you believe that FBI can ask Apple to share anything and they will agree, and not tell us, then what is even the point of this discussion? Then they already have access to every photo, every email, every text. Because Apple controls those apps on your phone.
- fsflover 5y agoThe difference is that now they confirmed that they do search your private images.
- jasamer 5y agoI thought the system is designed such that the threshold must be met to check the matches, i.e. it’s not possible to follow the FBIs request without changing the entire system.
- brokenmachine 5y agoint matchThreshold = 30; if (numMatches > matchThreshold) { snitch(customer) && customer.life.ruin() }