5 ms·
Does it have to be a photo of an actual human? Why not a work of graphic/art? A unicorn perhaps?
by achairapart 5y ago
Does it have to be a photo of an actual human?
Why not a work of graphic/art? A unicorn perhaps?
- itronitron 5y agoI think that's a better option as the 'thispersondoesnotexist' images can't be guaranteed to not actually look exactly like someone.
- _0ffh 5y agoThat could always happen, no matter how you generate the photo, but it's all but impossible that they'd also have the matching name.
- yvoschaap 5y agoPretty sure the Google algo would feature a isHumanDisplayed() for the photo's that would qualify.
- sumosudo 5y agoFrom what I can tell, Google engineers would actually write `isObjectDisplayed("Human")`
- achairapart 5y agoBut is Google looking for a human or it just picks the first homonymous human as a poorly automated fallback because there is no other data available? As far as I know, this worked at least for people like Banksy, Vincent van Gogh, the Zodiac killer and a few others.