You casually and 100% evidence-free suggest “hacker news” is ground zero for pushing Russian disinformation. Nyet comrade! This is not how reasoning, evidence,

You casually and 100% evidence-free suggest “hacker news” is ground zero for pushing Russian disinformation. Nyet comrade! This is not how reasoning, evidence, and facts work. One should trivially and casually dismiss your theory as quickly as it was cast. With respect to your other boogie men: these have been litigated extensively in the public space as de minimus. Yet you casually conjure demons from ether. Are you surprised that few find your method of argumentation or reasoning persuasive?