Twitter is covered under Section 230 as a platform and is legally immune to any content it hosts in the US. So no, it wasn't legally required to kick Trump off

Twitter is covered under Section 230 as a platform and is legally immune to any content it hosts in the US. So no, it wasn't legally required to kick Trump off its platform. So it's not following any law when it decides to host one voice and ban another. I'm sure the former Afghan government never enacted content laws that affect Twitter. It's whataboutism because Jack Dorsey is factually a jackass.