4 ms·

> Whether you consider the energy stored in the oxygen or the hydrocarbon doesn’t particularly matter. It truly doesn't matter which one you consider it to be,

> Whether you consider the energy stored in the oxygen or the hydrocarbon doesn’t particularly matter. It truly doesn't matter which one you consider it to be, given that both are technically incorrect. > The energy is in them being split apart. This is a common misconception (likely) perpetuated by highschool chemistry textbooks. The energy is actually release by the combination of oxygen with hydrogen and carbon. Let me explain. It takes energy to break chemical bonds. Some bonds take more energy to break, others take less. When a bond is created, an amount of energey (roughly) equal to the energy require to create the bond is released. Here I will demonstrate the combustion of a simple hydrocarbon: CH4 + 2 O2 -> CO2 + 2 H2O When this reaction takes place, there is not energy "stored" in either the Carbon-Hydrogen bonds or the Oxygen-Oxygen bonds that is "given off". Rather, energy is actually required to break the bonds. It goes something like this: CH4 + 2 O2 + (a little bit of energy) -> CO2 + 2 H2O + (a lot of energy). Making hydrocarbons (or hydrogen from water) is an energy intensive process because breaking the bonds in CO2 and H2O requires a lot of energy.

Robotbeat 5y ago
Yes, I didn't say the energy is stored in the bonds or is released by breaking bonds. I was referring to the fact that photosynthesis (or electrolysis) is used to separate the oxygen from the carbon/hydrogen in H2O or CO2. That's where the energy is stored (in the separation of the fuel from the oxygen).
lovecg 5y ago
Yeah this is correct and I was oversimplifying. Though that begs the question of how that equation balances out - where does (a lot of energy) comes from? The products on the right side sit at a lower energy level (they hold together “tighter”) overall. On the left, O2 needs less energy to break up while CH4 needs more, so in that sense the energy “comes” from O2 being easier to break apart. Conceptually I imagine these as a bunch of magnets with the two “magnets” in O2 held at a larger gap (so easier to take apart). With a jolt, things reconfigure and snap into a tighter pattern, and there’s an overall energy release.

Robotbeat 5y ago

Yes, I didn't say the energy is stored in the bonds or is released by breaking bonds. I was referring to the fact that photosynthesis (or electrolysis) is used to separate the oxygen from the carbon/hydrogen in H2O or CO2. That's where the energy is stored (in the separation of the fuel from the oxygen).

lovecg 5y ago

Yeah this is correct and I was oversimplifying. Though that begs the question of how that equation balances out - where does (a lot of energy) comes from? The products on the right side sit at a lower energy level (they hold together “tighter”) overall. On the left, O2 needs less energy to break up while CH4 needs more, so in that sense the energy “comes” from O2 being easier to break apart. Conceptually I imagine these as a bunch of magnets with the two “magnets” in O2 held at a larger gap (so easier to take apart). With a jolt, things reconfigure and snap into a tighter pattern, and there’s an overall energy release.