3 ms·
> I think having an employee that is not interested in money, is also not interested in the success of your business. Its that simple. They are obviously far,
by outworlder 5y ago
> I think having an employee that is not interested in money, is also not interested in the success of your business. Its that simple.
They are obviously far, far more interested in the business than someone who's just there for the money (most people) and that will leave as soon as someone else gives a little bit more.
Having a salary doesn't mean one is any more interested in the business – the only concern that provides is whether or not the business will be solvent to make payroll.
If you are giving founder-level stock options, then you can demand a similar level of "interest" as a founder. Anything else, it's just an exchange of money for labor. That's it.
- jay_kyburz 5y agoLeaving as soon as somebody paying more money is just as likely to happen as somebody leaving because there are more interesting problems to solve elsewhere. (Or they just get bored of your business problems) I'm not sure about stock options, but I agree that key employees should get rich when an owner gets rich.