3 ms·
So instead of methane that will stay ~10 year (GWP of 2.8-3.4) in the atmosphere, you release C02 (GWP of 1) that will stay ~10k year. So short term (for ~10yea
by pierre 5y ago
So instead of methane that will stay ~10 year (GWP of 2.8-3.4) in the atmosphere, you release C02 (GWP of 1) that will stay ~10k year. So short term (for ~10year) you reduce warming by ~3.5, if your look long term (10k years) you increase warming by 285x by doing that.
CH4 + 2 O2 → CO2 + 2 H2O
Not sure I will call that a win for the climate. (and this energy could be put to better use than burning it on crypto)
- Geee 5y agoI've been under the impression that methane is way worse for climate than carbon dioxide. And that's why most of the methane is usually flared, but maybe there are other reasons. There's a company called Crusoe Energy [0] who develops this, and they use the energy for other computational tasks as well. However, bitcoin mining is the most straightforward and scalable way to convert energy into money. [0] https://www.crusoeenergy.com https://www.crusoeenergy.com
- s1artibartfast 5y agoGWP already takes into account half life. This has been thoroughly explored. Leaked methane is 11x worse than the co2 formed by burning it when half life is taken into account. Also, our best estimate is that the single half-life for excess CO2 lies within the range of 19 to 49 years, with a reasonable average being 31 years. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://static.berkeleyearth.org/memos/fugitive-methane-and-greenhouse-warming.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi4us24jbvyAhXDc98KHcZgCZwQFnoECAQQBg&usg=AOvVaw0_9D111jIMe3amYm53cBbw https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https:/...
- pierre 5y agoI didn't take that into account, thanks