The problem with deontological arguments is, they tend to develop along lines that people are comfortable with. Isn't it interesting that we find it immoral to

The problem with deontological arguments is, they tend to develop along lines that people are comfortable with. Isn't it interesting that we find it immoral to think of people besides ourselves having sex, or sex that we dislike? As a gay man, I'm thrilled your deontology doesn't define my world anymore. Your drug-resistant STI argument is circular. If we hadn't treated those, we would've been breeding grounds for rampant STIs anyway-- whether they would've been drug-resistant would be immaterial. And in a world where we acknowledge that promiscuity is a trait that displays in humans, whether they're shunned for it or not, we can provide open and honest education on how to handle that sex safely.