3 ms·
> So we should recognize and accept the new reality and update Section 230 accordingly. The Owners have successfully convinced their subjects that this is a ba
by TrispusAttucks 5y ago
> So we should recognize and accept the new reality and update Section 230 accordingly.
The Owners have successfully convinced their subjects that this is a bad idea.
That said, we must tread lightly with the precarious Section 230 and any new modification.
Edit: Owner's are down voting you fast.
- specialist 5y agoNo worries. Arguing on HN is batting practice. After reading and listening a lot, I honestly still have no clue if or how Section 230 should be updated. Best I've come up with is restoring provenance (authenticity). Which then triggers the Freedom Speeches™ advocates, who purposefully misconstrue any constraint or accountability of Owners or Flak as an existential threat to Sources. The faux outrage is all so banal, predictable. As if our society has never had this argument before, ad nauseum, and this iteration is something really special.