3 ms·
>but it's not like Pfizer says “Trust us, we employ doctors!” and the FDA says “Sounds great, no need to check!” Each step of that process involves peer-reviewe
by hitpointdrew 5y ago
>but it's not like Pfizer says “Trust us, we employ doctors!” and the FDA says “Sounds great, no need to check!” Each step of that process involves peer-reviewed publications, public data releases, and reviews by panels of scientific experts.
All these "steps in the process" are completely meaningless when there is a revolving door with big pharma and FDA. This is nothing more than safety/peer-review theater.
Example: Scott Gottlieb FDA commissioner 2017-2019, currently sits on the board of directors at Pfizer.
Are you really going to put up a stink and fight on an approval if the end goal is cushy job at one of these companies? You can bet if you just "push it through" you will be looked on favorably for one of these jobs, but if you put up resistance and actually want to do due diligence, well then you will never be considered.
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair
- freemint 5y agoExcept hard evidence is created during the trial. The statistical procedures to evaluate things are standardized.