5 ms·
There's nothing new in the actual story. I thought it's placement on the front page (below the fold) of the print edition was significant. It's not exactly a te
by arghnoname 15y ago
There's nothing new in the actual story. I thought it's placement on the front page (below the fold) of the print edition was significant. It's not exactly a tech publication.
- notexactly 15y agoI don't know what you mean by It's not exactly a tech publication. but this is not exactly a tech problem, this is a general business problem.
- corin_ 15y agoOK seriously, why did you feel the need to create a fake account to post that from?
- danparsonson 15y agoI don't get it - couldn't it just be the first time (s)he has commented? I originally made my account in order to post my first reply to something.
- corin_ 15y agoNote the name chosen, and the second and third words that (s)he quoted.
- jonknee 15y agoMaybe it's the start of a reddit like novelty account. There sure are a lot of "not exactly" situations on HN. Could make a karma mint on any patent thread.
- hugh3 15y agoWow, now I wish I'd thought of having a notexactly account. Maybe I'll have to settle for yesbut
- notexactly 15y agoYou may have this one (if you can live with a throwaway). I have posted my original account in a comment above. It has my email ID in it. Email me and I will give you the password. Before that I will make a comment here stating that I have transfered the account and will wait till the delete option is gone. Seems fair?
- chc 15y agoIs it still called a "mint" if it's all downvotes?
- robtoo 15y agoI'd just assume that they needed to create an account to comment and picked the first username that came to mind. Quite logically, this was a couple of words from the reply that they had already formulated in their mind.
- neutronicus 15y agoDon't new users show up as green?
- notexactly 15y agoJust to be clear to all the posters here, yes this is a throw away. I made this throw away because that is how I use HN. I had a good account a few months back called rick_2047[1] (yes that guy!). After that one got hell banned (my second or third hell ban I think) I have observed that I digress from most of the HN community on the meaning of the term "trolling". No biggie HN people, thats just a different point of view. No hard feelings (but I still would like that account back or at least have it purged)[2]. I don't have a strong urge to post comments these days (that is a con) but I am less of a karma whore now (thats a pro). Most of the articles here were and still are very irrelevant to me. I am not doing any startups so don't need all that knowledge and am not into CS so don't read those articles as well. But every once in a while something interesting and generic (as generic as it gets on HN) comes up and I feel the urge to comment. PG made it really easy to make a new account. I chose a few words relevant the comment and then post it. I check the thread for a day or two (because they are not active after that, also I usually don't post very interesting stuff). I read the guidelines and all. I didn't find any clause stating that one cannot have multiple accounts. If I have missed something please do tell me. But even after that I know I will keep doing this, but at least I know I am doing something illegal. [1]http://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=rick_2047 http://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=rick_2047 (I think I made kind of a record with this one, of the most unpopular comment of all time, still would like conformation on that) [2] If PG is reading this, which he most probably isn't, if you can be so kind and purge my account that would be great. Thanks in advance.
- jsavimbi 15y ago> (below the fold) web 1.0 term now in disuse. As soon as a story, any story, is disseminated by a world renown publication such as the Financial Times, it might as well be the main story for the amount of time the long tail decides to keep it alive. It's a business problem; the tech part to AirBnB was just the application. Developers should get used to the fact that their apps grow up, move away and marry business people.
- michael_h 15y agoPoint taken, but 'below the fold' is most assuredly not a web 1.0 term when we're talking about a printed publication.
- jsavimbi 15y agoIn today's terms, a printed publication is entirely below the fold.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- SoftwareMaven 15y agoThe "fold" doesn't refer to the bottom of the screen, but to the crease in a newspaper. Above the fold were the headlines that drew buyers because they could be seen in news stands and such. Below the fold were those that couldn't. Being above the fold on the front page meant your story was a big deal. http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/below_the_fold http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/below_the_fold http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Above_the_fold http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Above_the_fold It was a newspaper term that got repurposed on the web before user experience studies (not the "versioning" of the web) showed it wasn't nearly as important as it is in newspapers.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- ______ 15y agoWhat is "new" is that this is now getting a lot of exposure in the non-tech press, which it wasn't before. Techcrunch is relatively niche compared to FT, and hacker news is even more niche. What this means for AirBnb is that for a great many readers of FT, if they haven't heard of AirBnB before, will have an opinion that the service is inherently unsafe (even if this is the 0.001% story). And once someone makes up their opinion on a product or service, it is very hard to make them change