4 ms·
Don't forget 1) carrying enough energy 2) getting the price point down to what people are prepared to pay for telepresence. These are very tough indeed.
by robotresearcher 5y ago
Don't forget
1) carrying enough energy
2) getting the price point down to what people are prepared to pay
for telepresence.
These are very tough indeed.
- derefr 5y agoThere are a lot of use-cases for which a tethered telepresence robot (with, say, a five-minute emergency battery for getting swapping from one wall-socket to another) would work just fine. You wouldn't see infantry drones, but it'd work for most anything that occurs solely inside a building.
- robotresearcher 5y agoTethers are a nightmare. A nightmare.
- derefr 5y agoFor autonomous robots, sure. And for dumb robots. But are they a problem for people—e.g. rock climbers, divers, etc.? If not, then they also wouldn't be a problem for remote people, provided those remote people get enough sensory feedback to be aware of the relative position of the tether. After all, the whole point of all this motor modelling is to enable the robot to do things humans do, like noticing when its foot lightly touches its own tether, and then using its hands to unhook the tether from its foot, temporarily pull it lightly aside, step around it, and then drop it. (Think: vacuuming a room with a tethered vacuum cleaner.) That's a very hard thing to teach a robot to do; but a human that realizes they're "plugged in" would do it almost intuitively.
- robotresearcher 5y agoAll that messing with the tether is pure overhead not spent working. It's also beyond the current state of the art. A few meters of high-current cable weighs a LOT. Exerts large forces in weird directions and adds to your motor requirements. On humans and tethers: Do you like wifi? Why not stick to Ethernet? SCUBA is diving without a tether. It’s popular. Climbers use ropes so they don't die, not because ropes are fun. Bouldering is popular. Singers and guitarists tend to move to wireless for performance as soon as they can afford to (purists excepted). Because tethers suck. Suuuuuuck.
- derefr 5y ago> SCUBA is diving without a tether. It’s popular. Look up saturation diving. The link from the diver to their dive bell — now that's a tether. One critical to human life, unable to be lost for even a moment, and yet which humans freely do freaking oxyacetylene welding around. And yet it still works out fine, in 99.999% of dives. Humans are good at managing tethers! But to be clear, my point isn't that tethered robots would be preferable to or even as good as untethered robots. Just because humans are good at tethers doesn't mean they like them. So of course untethered telepresence robots would be better, if they were practical. My point is that tethered human-equivalent telepresence robots — in combination with human operators who can map their intuitive management of their own body-plan into management of the robot and its tether — will be practical in an absolute sense, long before untethered human-equivalent telepresence robots become practical. We'll have tethered telepresence 'bots doing real, useful stuff out there in the world (decomissioning toxic/irradiated structures in non-polluting ways, say—or replacing those sat divers!), long before we manage to make batteries dense enough to power untethered telepresence 'bots for the same purposes.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]