You should provide evidence, and when you go back and edit your response to do so, that evidence should be relevant to the discussion at hand. There's a huge d

You should provide evidence, and when you go back and edit your response to do so, that evidence should be relevant to the discussion at hand. There's a huge difference between data on a disease that's been studied for over 40 years, vs one that's only been around for a few months. If you think the CDC got it's facts wrong on Lyme disease, it's as simple as saying "This source disagrees", and provide the source. Jumping to the conclusion that your unnamed source is more accurate than any other is another problem itself.