2 ms·
Presence 4 years or so later. So, maybe the patient was infected again some time after initial treatment?
by megous 5y ago
Presence 4 years or so later. So, maybe the patient was infected again some time after initial treatment?
- darkerside 5y agoOccam's Razor applies. You're not wrong, but they continue to lean on the "evidence doesn't support" angle. At some point that looks like bias.
- inter_netuser 5y agoThe study is a follow-up study on primates that confirmed the exact same thing, only to be dismissed "because not in humans duuuuh" Now we have human brain autopsies. Plenty of denial right in this thread. And then people wonder why people don't trust physicians and do not vaccinate.